Running a full enterprise LDAP directory like OpenLDAP, 389 Directory Server, or FreeIPA is overkill for homelabs, small teams, and personal infrastructure. If you only need a simple way to authenticate users across self-hosted services — Dashboards, Proxmox, Nextcloud, or Gitea — you want something that installs in minutes, not days.
This guide compares the two most popular lightweight LDAP servers: LLDAP and GLauth. Both are open source, self-hosted, and designed for environments where simplicity matters more than enterprise feature depth.
For readers already running a full directory service, our OpenLDAP vs 389DS vs FreeIPA guide covers the enterprise alternatives in detail. If you’re building a complete auth stack, also see our Casdoor vs Zitadel vs Authentik comparison for SSO and identity management options.
Why Choose a Lightweight LDAP Server?
Traditional LDAP directories are powerful but complex. They require deep knowledge of LDIF schemas, overlay modules, and replication topology. For many use cases, you don’t need that complexity:
- Homelab authentication: A single source of truth for usernames and passwords across Jellyfin, Gitea, Proxmox, and other services
- Small team infrastructure: Shared credentials management without cloud dependency
- Development and CI/CD environments: Disposable LDAP instances for testing authentication flows
- IoT and edge deployments: Low-resource LDAP servers for constrained hardware
A lightweight LDAP server gives you the standardized LDAP protocol that hundreds of applications already support, without the operational overhead of an enterprise directory.
LLDAP: Modern Lightweight LDAP
LLDAP (Light LDAP) is a modern, opinionated LDAP server written in Rust. It targets simplicity: a web UI for user management, SQLite or PostgreSQL backends, and straightforward Docker deployment. As of April 2026, it has 6,193 GitHub stars and remains actively maintained.
Key Features
- Built-in web UI for user and group management — no LDIF files needed
- SQLite or PostgreSQL backend — SQLite is perfect for single-server setups
- Docker-native — single container deployment
- Schema management — supports standard LDAP object classes (inetOrgPerson, posixAccount)
- Password policies — configurable strength requirements
- TOTP support — optional two-factor authentication
- REST API — programmatic user management
- Low resource usage — Rust binary, typically under 100MB RAM
Docker Compose Setup
Here is a production-ready Docker Compose configuration for LLDAP with PostgreSQL:
| |
For the simplest setup, use SQLite by omitting the LLDAP_DATABASE_URL variable — the database file is stored in the mounted /data volume.
Reverse Proxy Configuration (Nginx)
| |
GLauth: Config-Driven Lightweight LDAP
GLauth is a lightweight LDAP server written in Go, designed around configuration files rather than a database backend. It reads users and groups from YAML, JSON, or environment variables, making it ideal for infrastructure-as-code workflows and ephemeral environments. It currently has 2,816 GitHub stars and is actively maintained.
Key Features
- Config-file driven — YAML or JSON configuration defines all users, groups, and policies
- No database required — stateless by default; reads from config files
- Multiple backends — supports config files, LDAP proxy mode, and SQLite
- TOTP and WebAuthn — two-factor authentication support
- Multi-tenant — supports multiple organizations in a single instance
- WireGuard integration — built-in WireGuard key generation for VPN setups
- POSIX schema — supports uidNumber, gidNumber for Linux authentication (nslcd/SSSD)
- Go binary — single binary deployment, cross-platform
Docker Compose Setup
GLauth uses a configuration file mounted into the container. Here is a complete setup:
| |
GLauth Configuration (YAML)
Create glauth.cfg in the same directory as your compose file:
| |
Generate password hashes with:
| |
Traefik Reverse Proxy Configuration
| |
Feature Comparison: LLDAP vs GLauth
| Feature | LLDAP | GLauth |
|---|---|---|
| Language | Rust | Go |
| GitHub Stars | 6,193 | 2,816 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Backend | SQLite / PostgreSQL | Config file / SQLite / LDAP proxy |
| Web UI | Built-in (React frontend) | None (CLI/API only) |
| User Management | Web UI + REST API | Config file edit + REST API |
| TOTP/2FA | Yes | Yes (TOTP + WebAuthn) |
| LDAP Standard | Full LDAPv3 | Full LDAPv3 |
| POSIX Schema | Yes | Yes |
| Password Policy | Configurable rules | SHA256 hashing |
| Multi-tenant | No (single org) | Yes |
| WireGuard Keys | No | Yes (built-in) |
| Deployment Complexity | Low (single container) | Very low (single binary) |
| Best For | Teams needing a web UI | Infrastructure-as-code workflows |
Choosing the Right Tool
Pick LLDAP if:
- You want a visual web interface for managing users and groups
- Your team prefers GUI-based administration over config file editing
- You need PostgreSQL for durability and multi-writer scenarios
- You want built-in password strength policies and TOTP setup flows
- You’re running a homelab or small team with 5-50 users
Pick GLauth if:
- You manage infrastructure with GitOps — config files live in version control
- You need stateless deployments where users are defined in code
- You want WireGuard integration built into your LDAP server
- You need multi-tenant support for multiple organizations
- You prefer the simplicity of a single Go binary with no database dependency
- You’re provisioning ephemeral environments (CI/CD, staging) where config-as-code is the norm
Integration Examples
Authenticating Linux Login via SSSD
Both LLDAP and GLauth support POSIX attributes, enabling Linux machines to authenticate against your LDAP server:
| |
Connecting Gitea to LLDAP
In Gitea’s app.ini:
| |
Connecting Jellyfin to GLauth
Jellyfin supports LDAP authentication via its built-in LDAP plugin:
| |
FAQ
What is the difference between LLDAP and GLauth?
LLDAP provides a web-based user interface with SQLite or PostgreSQL backends, making it ideal for teams that want to manage users visually. GLauth is config-file driven (YAML/JSON) and stateless, making it better suited for infrastructure-as-code workflows and GitOps pipelines. Both support the standard LDAPv3 protocol and POSIX schemas.
Can I migrate from GLauth to LLDAP or vice versa?
Both servers use standard LDAP schemas (inetOrgPerson, posixAccount), so users can be exported via ldapsearch and re-imported. However, GLauth stores passwords as SHA256 hashes while LLDAP uses its own hashing mechanism. You would need to reset passwords or use a migration script that handles password re-hashing.
Do these lightweight LDAP servers support replication?
Neither LLDAP nor GLauth natively supports multi-master replication like OpenLDAP. If you need high availability, place the LDAP server behind a load balancer with a shared PostgreSQL backend (LLDAP) or use a configuration management tool to keep GLauth config files synchronized across instances.
Can I use LLDAP or GLauth with SSH key authentication?
GLauth has built-in SSH key support — you can store public keys in the config file and use them for SSH authentication. LLDAP does not natively store SSH keys, but you can use the ldapssh or sssd integration on the client side to pull keys from LDAP if you add them as custom attributes.
Are LLDAP and GLauth production-ready?
Yes, both are used in production environments. LLDAP is widely deployed in homelabs and small businesses, with over 6,000 GitHub stars and active development. GLauth is used in CI/CD pipelines, edge deployments, and by teams that prefer config-driven infrastructure. Neither is designed for enterprise-scale deployments with thousands of users — for those scenarios, consider OpenLDAP or 389 Directory Server.
How do I backup LLDAP data?
For LLDAP with SQLite, simply backup the /data volume directory. For PostgreSQL, use standard pg_dump commands. GLauth requires no backup if you use config-file mode — your users are defined in version-controlled YAML files. If using GLauth’s SQLite backend, backup the SQLite database file.
Further Reading
If you’re building out a complete authentication infrastructure, consider these related guides from our collection:
- For enterprise-scale directory services, see our OpenLDAP vs 389DS vs FreeIPA guide
- For single sign-on and identity federation, check out Casdoor vs Zitadel vs Authentik
- For managing access across services, our Authentik vs Keycloak vs Authelia comparison covers full identity providers